<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Authorship 2.0 &#187; technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://authorship.edublogs.org/tag/technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://authorship.edublogs.org</link>
	<description>An exploration of authorship and learning in the digital age</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:57:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Bridging the Writing Gap</title>
		<link>http://authorship.edublogs.org/2008/04/29/bridging-the-writing-gap/</link>
		<comments>http://authorship.edublogs.org/2008/04/29/bridging-the-writing-gap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 23:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marielle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teaching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://authorship.edublogs.org/2008/04/29/bridging-the-writing-gap/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In collaboration with the College Board&#8217;s National Commission on Writing, the Pew Internet &#38; American Life Project has just published Writing, Technology and Teens, a research report on perceptions of teens and their parents about the relationship between their frequent informal writing through digital communication media and formal writing considered to be important for success [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In collaboration with the College Board&#8217;s National Commission on Writing, the Pew Internet &amp; American Life Project has just published <a href="http://pewresearch.org/pubs/808/writing-technology-and-teens" title="Writing, Technology and Teens" target="_blank">Writing, Technology and Teens</a>, a research report on perceptions of teens and their parents about the relationship between their frequent informal writing through digital communication media and formal writing considered to be important for success in school and work. In short, they found that, &#8220;Most teenagers spend a considerable amount of their life composing texts, but they do not think that a lot of the material they create electronically is <em><strong>real</strong></em> writing.&#8221;   Perhaps if they were using electronic communication media in the classroom, as well as outside of school, they would feel differently.</p>
<p>Most teens felt that they could benefit from improved instruction in writing.  When teens were asked about their suggestions for improvement, researchers discovered that, &#8220;Overall, 82% of teens feel that additional in-class writing time would improve their writing abilities and 78% feel the same way about their teachers using computer-based writing tools.&#8221;</p>
<p>Focus group teens offered this helpful advice to educators:<br />
&#8220;&#8230;they are motivated to write when they can select topics that are relevant to their lives and interests, and report greater enjoyment of school writing when they have the opportunity to write creatively. Having teachers or other adults who challenge them, present them with interesting curricula and give them detailed feedback also serves as a motivator for teens. Teens also report writing for an audience motivates them to write and write well.&#8221;</p>
<p>Asking students to share their views about their own learning can be so illuminating.   Students, in their infinite wisdom, have identified what makes Web 2.0 communication media so powerful:  they genuinely put the act of communication back into writing.  They offer a platform for students to use writing to develop their ideas and communicate those ideas to real audiences with real purpose.  Isn&#8217;t that what we&#8217;re trying to prepare them to do?    If we want students to learn to communicate in writing, then we should give them opportunities to do so authentically in the course of instruction.</p>
<p>Artificial writing exercises that ask students to tell teachers and test-makers what they already know, or prove command of rhetoric divorced of meaningful substance, do not qualify as authentic communication.   Students are eager to use blogs, wikis, and threaded discussions for academic writing because they offer opportunities to interact in writing with other people around ideas.   As teachers, we must find ways to engage students in writing about things that matter to them and to society and facilitate the sorts of interactions that help them sharpen the expression of their thoughts.  And we are fortunate to now have such helpful tools available to help us meet those goals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://authorship.edublogs.org/2008/04/29/bridging-the-writing-gap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
